To the editor:
I am concerned about the RSU 50 budget negotiations because of my lack of confidence in the superintendent. During the budget validation meeting of 2013-14, Superintendent Larry Malone pointed out to the citizens that he was under no obligation to abide by any agreement he may enter into during the process. Further he made clear that he also is not obligated to operate within the budget guidelines once a budget is approved. For example;
a town manager is required to spend the town’s money as set out in each of the warrants approved during the town’s annual budget meeting, the superintendent is under no such requirement. The RSU 50 business manager, numerous times during the meeting, had to speak for the superintendent as he seemed to be adrift on the inner workings of the budget.
How can I vote for the 2014-15 budget that doesn’t pass the stink test? We have reportedly got between 700 and 800 students with a budget of nearly $10 million — this is ridiculous.
We voted down this year’s budget and what does the board do? Agree to cutting building maintenance and resubmit the budget to the public for a July 29 validation meeting. Well, this was last year’s threat, why cut building maintenance? Here is why, the superintendent wants a new school, so, if he cuts the maintenance of buildings he can, down the line, blame the public for the poor condition of the buildings and enhance his argument for needing a new school.
I have no idea what is going to happen with this money if the budget is approved. For sure though I know the superintendent will hire whoever he wants, and let go whoever he wants. He will spend the funds however he wants. He will tell us whatever is needed to pass a budget.
It is time for the school board to act and find a superintendent with integrity and a budget that makes sense. No excuses.
David Robinson
Sherman
